Asrock 939A785GMH/128M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 939A785GMH/128M  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20090923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 12:23
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4600+
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 35.4
2-Core 71.7
43% 62.9 Pts
4-Core 70
8-Core 70.3
9% 70.2 Pts
64-Core 71
4% 71 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200
ASRock(1849 9710) 336MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.970.100.7000
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
0.71% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.6
Parallax 1
1% 0.87 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.63 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.71%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500120G 120GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 64 62 60 65 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.3% Average
Read 232
Write 188
Mixed 180
SusWrite 71.7
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 30.8
4K Mixed 22.5
81% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 65.8
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 71.9
57% 78.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 83%
Samsung HD503HI 500GB-$41
925GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 197 182 191 87 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 61.5
Mixed 74
SusWrite 169
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.9
235% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2GB
400, 400, 400, 400 MHz
256, 256, 1024, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.4
10% 3.67 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 939A785GMH/128M Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 939A785GMH/128M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback