Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201029
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 04 '21 at 04:55
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 125
2-Core 234
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 667
65% 534 Pts
64-Core 661
41% 661 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 66.6
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 64
54% 66.9 fps
MRender 66.2
Gravity 69.8
Splatting 64.3
54% 66.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT250MX500SSD4 250GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 149 179 171 136 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 484
Write 433
Mixed 422
SusWrite 163
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 41.5
142% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 276
227% 326 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 121%
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74
80GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 180 181 181 182 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 436
Write 182
Mixed 221
SusWrite 182
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 33.3
118% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 166
145% 220 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 89%
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB
142GB free
Firmware: 02.05D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 54.4
Write 56.7
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 55.9
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3360320AS 360GB-$79
124GB free
Firmware: 3.CHN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 19 19 20 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 20.9
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 18.7
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
59GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 47 47 47 47 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 63.4
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 46.7
40% 53.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 50%
WD Elements 2620 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 109 108 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 126
Write 106
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 109
132% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Adata CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 Adata 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
76.4% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,050 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback