Asrock A75M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A75M  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '21 at 15:05
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 63.7
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 85.3
41% 63.9 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 166
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
ASRock(1849 9640) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.98% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 4.6
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.98%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$117
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0903D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 343 366 368 385 375 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 413
Write 290
Mixed 264
SusWrite 352
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 49
4K Mixed 30.1
99% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 71.9
DQ Mixed 98.6
83% 124 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 114%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 141 143 145 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 149
Write 139
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 142
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.8% Below average
MC Read 17
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12.2
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A75M Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock A75M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback