Asus G551JW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus G551JW  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G551JW
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 22:54
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 540
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 81%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Asus(1043 185D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6109
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
18% Very poor
Lighting 22.7
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 24.9
18% 22.1 fps
MRender 24.5
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.7
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-128 128GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN05872
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 108 95 102 73 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 394
Write 64.9
Mixed 110
SusWrite 97.9
36% 167 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 58.8
4K Mixed 27.2
101% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 54.2
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 69.1
49% 62 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 8.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11.3
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G551JW Builds (Compare 653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G551JW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback