MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics33.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 52.5
2-Core 63.8
40% 59.7 Pts
4-Core 75.3
8-Core 60.4
9% 67.9 Pts
64-Core 76.6
5% 76.6 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.4% Below average
Lighting 42.5
Reflection 60.8
Parallax 41
35% 48.1 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 41.4
Splatting 36.1
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
851GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 78 122 155 171 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 170
Write 98.1
Mixed 102
SusWrite 134
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 1333EL Series 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.1% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.8
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI FM2-A75MA-E35 (MS-7721) - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $538
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback