HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics42.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '21 at 04:43
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 73.1
2-Core 148
58% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 262
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
MSI(1462 3419) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.2% Average
Lighting 51.1
Reflection 57.1
Parallax 77.8
42% 62 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 40.3
43% 54.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M510_2.5_7MM_128GB 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DL06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 124 123 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.3% Above average
Read 272
Write 181
Mixed 193
SusWrite 125
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 29.7
105% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 39.3
40% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
117GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 166 167 169 168 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 143
Write 142
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 166
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 98%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
107GB free
Firmware: SC11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 86
Mixed 44.7
SusWrite 95.1
58% 79.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
130GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 125 124 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 172
Write 124
Mixed 70
SusWrite 125
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392B1K70CM0-YH9 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.7% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback