HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory17.4 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 21:50
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 167
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 642
56% 479 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 5000
Nvidia(10DE 0770) 2.5GB
CLim: 513 MHz, MLim: 750 MHz, Ram: 2.5GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 22.4
Parallax 14.3
10% 16.2 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 14.9
13% 15.8 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 145 153 149 139 137 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.3% Average
Read 157
Write 151
Mixed 142
SusWrite 146
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 23.1
81% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 67.3
DQ Mixed 33.1
29% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$25
198GB free
Firmware: 3A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 91 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 92
Write 92.7
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 90.6
62% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST3120026AS 120GB-$24
93GB free
Firmware: 8.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 52 52 52 52 52 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 51.4
Write 50
Mixed 36
SusWrite 51.7
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 31%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0143
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 110 111 111 109 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 108
Write 121
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.8
192% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273DH0-YH9 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 19.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,950 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback