MSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B09
MotherboardMSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)  (all builds)
Memory59.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 17:41
Run Duration79 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
74% 137 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 923
82% 692 Pts
64-Core 2,523
156% 2,523 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 116F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1605 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 48.4
Reflection 52.2
Parallax 45.8
39% 48.8 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 46.3
Splatting 40.5
34% 42 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3565
Write 4017
Mixed 3,737
846% 3,773 MB/s
4K Read 193
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 108
484% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 793
DQ Write 676
DQ Mixed 734
550% 734 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2400 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 61.9
MC Mixed 52.9
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 24
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 103%
This bench: 143%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 SLI PLUS (MS-7B09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback