Asus G750JM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus G750JM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G750JM
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '21 at 12:50
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 91
2-Core 173
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 478
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 157D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.16% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 6.1
3% 8.27 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.16%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 93 85 95 96 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 81.8
Write 98
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 87.3
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2BC10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 115 115 113 114 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 117
Write 68.2
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 112
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 65%
General USB Flash Disk 125GB
115GB free, PID 8381
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 0 14 7.2 3.7 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 18.5
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 9.9
27% 22 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 3.2
243% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 18.3
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G750JM Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G750JM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $507
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback