IBM eServer x3400-[79766AY]-

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemIBM eServer x3400-[79766AY]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM M97IP
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 17:57
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5355
LGA 771, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 60
1-Core 30.4
2-Core 60.8
34% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 119
16% 119 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
PwrHis(1787 200F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver:
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 55.1
35% 48.2 fps
MRender 45.3
Gravity 43.4
Splatting 32.7
32% 40.5 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 293GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 265 254 260 263 253 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 462
Write 296
Mixed 276
SusWrite 260
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 14.4
41% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 30.8
DQ Mixed 21.5
17% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.8% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 3.4
MC Mixed 4.3
11% 3.9 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.2
10% 3.53 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback