HP Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8459
Memory	0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190502
Uptime	7.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 28 '21 at 12:02
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 40.6 1-Core 53.1 2-Core 81.2 35% 58.3 Pts	4-Core 85.8 8-Core 83.8 11% 84.8 Pts	64-Core 75.1 5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 8459) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 18.40.16.03 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	2.67% Terrible	Lighting 3 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 4.5 2% 3.8 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 4.9 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.67% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB 17,295 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20120006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 158 194 248 262 290 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 367 Write 309 Mixed 305 SusWrite 228 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 53.3 4K Mixed 34.2 111% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 176 135% 186 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 197%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 930GB free Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 148 171 186 194 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 199 Write 90.9 Mixed 72.6 SusWrite 177 98% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB 2,458 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.1% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 7.7 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 200 20% 200 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx Builds (Compare 101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop 290-a0xxx

CPU
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	31x
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	30x
Celeron J4005IntelBench 28%, 1,572 samples	26x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	31x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	30x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	26x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	2x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 43%, 19,029 samples	13x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	10x
HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GBSK_HynixBench 20%, 117 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16