ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Precision T1600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago, 8 years ago.

System	Dell Precision T1600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T1600 (all builds)
Memory	16.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111017
Uptime	9 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '15 at 16:37
Run Duration	489 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 3,302 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 88.6 2-Core 173 60% 131 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 445 48% 384 Pts	64-Core 482 30% 482 Pts
Poor: 61% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V4800 (FireGL V) 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 6% AMD(1002 240A) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	3.45% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 4.69 Parallax 3.06 3% 3.94 fps	MRender 4.67 Gravity 2.63 Splatting 5.78 4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.45% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1549 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 44 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 58 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 10 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1318955660	54.6% Above average	Read 266 Write 202 Mixed 213 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 42.8 4K Mixed 19.1 92% 30.5 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 19.1 38% 71.1 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 124%
WD WD3200AAJS-56B4A0 500GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 460GB free Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 143 143 3833 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 248 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1959 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 247 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 19 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 175 175 75238 (C2) HDA temperature 113 97 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 99 99 1330 (F1) Unknown 200 200 3140255829 (F2) Unknown 200 200 3300771934	66.8% Good	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 109 86% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.86 4K Mixed 0.48 117% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 63%
Opnfiler VIRTUAL-DISK 31GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 29GB free Firmware: 0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	7.01% Terrible	Read 11.2 Write 11.3 Mixed 11.2 8% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.43 4K Write 2.84 4K Mixed 1.47 359% 2.58 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.01% Great: 31%
WD Elements 1078 2TB 2,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 90.6 Write 82.9 Mixed 73.7 104% 82.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.54 4K Mixed 0.21 62% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 43%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72 6,221 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 57GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 133 Write 121 Mixed 28.1 109% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 9.4 4K Write 10.6 4K Mixed 4.64 555% 8.23 MB/s	DQ Read 10.3 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 4.82 590% 8.85 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 111%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 16GB 2,489 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 14GB free, PID db8a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 102 Write 44.2 Mixed 31.5 63% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.78 4K Write 0.77 4K Mixed 0.15 49% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 30%
General UDisk 2GB 1,991 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID null Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	5.67% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 5.43 Mixed 5 10% 9.75 MB/s	4K Read 7.34 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.004 28% 2.45 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.67% Great: 9%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical Precision T1600 Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T1600

CPU
Xeon E31225IntelBench 69%, 3,353 samples	196x
Xeon E3-1245IntelBench 70%, 3,302 samples	161x
Xeon E31270IntelBench 71%, 3,539 samples	96x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	52x
Quadro 600NvidiaBench 3%, 15,964 samples	46x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 11,003 samples	9x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 2,942 samples	9x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 4x4GBSamsungBench 49%, 1,553 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback