Lenovo 20FXS0ES02

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20FXS0ES02  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FXS0ES02
Memory8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 23:20
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU6%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6440HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 202
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 397
53% 399 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 5050) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5749
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 11.6
11% 12.4 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 12.2
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dogfish 128GB 128GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 77 33 56 60 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 454
Write 344
Mixed 296
SusWrite 84.5
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 1.6
54% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 83.9
DQ Write 68.6
DQ Mixed 17
29% 56.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ACF050 500GB-$150
243GB free
Firmware: AV0A3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
51% Above average
Read 83
Write 82.2
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 94.6
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB Micron 8ATF51264HZ-2G1A2 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 19.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 18
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback