Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory20.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 21:39
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370E-$471
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 69.2
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 112
49% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 260
28% 220 Pts
64-Core 120
8% 120 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.2% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 66
58% 69.9 fps
MRender 55.3
Gravity 71
Splatting 66
53% 64.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 938
Write 493
154% 716 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 9
60% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 214
138% 158 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
305GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 83 81 85 85 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 68.4
Write 72.2
Mixed 75.6
SusWrite 81.9
56% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 138 138 138 140 140 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 148
Write 115
Mixed 78
SusWrite 136
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 84%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
13GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 7.1 7.6 7.3 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.87% Terrible
Read 28.6
Write 22.7
Mixed 18.9
SusWrite 7.7
24% 19.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
75% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.87%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 992125 (997125) 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28% Poor
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 15.3
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.2
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 902 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback