Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Memory 50.6 1-Core 67.9 2-Core 123 46% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 178 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 21E2) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.9 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.5 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hyperx Fury 3D 480G 480GB 212 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 218 21 5.9 177 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 390 Write 307 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 126 46% 210 MB/s	4K Read 10 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 0.8 20% 6.3 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 9 DQ Mixed 0.2 31% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 106%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 194GB free Firmware: AM0P1D SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 107 107 108 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 103 Write 104 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 107 61% 84.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 71% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 8GB 369 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 16.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 9.5 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 158 25% 158 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM