Biostar A68N-5600E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar A68N-5600E  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 07:07
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A4-3350B APU R4 Graphics
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 47.8
1-Core 35.3
2-Core 69.2
32% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 123
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F4) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X02c08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 265 288 305 304 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 311
Write 298
Mixed 256
SusWrite 273
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 23.4
85% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 187
140% 184 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68N-5600E Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A68N-5600E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback