HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 83% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86E3
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 03:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU3%
CPU Throttled 83%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 130
2-Core 210
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 444
53% 407 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
HP(103C 86E3) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6089
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.93 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 6.5
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 24%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+238G 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 271 262 250 442 387 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 101%
Hitachi HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
790GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 91 89 91 91 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 79
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 87.8
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.M16FJ 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
77.6% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29.9
MC Mixed 23.9
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx Builds (Compare 2,128 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 15-cs3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback