HP OMEN by HP Laptop

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 825F
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 19 '17 at 04:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89
1-Core 109
2-Core 206
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 538
56% 448 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
HP(103C 825F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2272 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 48% Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IM2S3138E-128GM-B 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E27-HP Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 463
Write 161
Mixed 229
62% 284 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 15.8
96% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28.1
DQ Write 67.1
DQ Mixed 24.8
25% 40 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 79%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
448GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 118
Write 110
Mixed 117
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.17
67% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4S240FSD.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 30
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 26.4
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 25.4
70% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop Builds (Compare 6,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback