Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210119
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '21 at 00:40
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
93% 171 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 857
81% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,249
77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 29.1
Parallax 42.8
27% 34.9 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 27
25% 30.3 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS2130 1TB SSD
482GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213530
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 70 70 83 75 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 1,231
Write 144
Mixed 236
SusWrite 77.9
90% 422 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 2.5
59% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 74.7
59% 83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 298%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
38GB free
Firmware: CS900Y13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 137 48 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 402
Write 383
Mixed 373
SusWrite 96.8
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 36.7
132% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 215
183% 265 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 104%
Intel 760p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$4
61GB free
Firmware: 005C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 780 471 496 268 488 819 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,706
Write 439
Mixed 874
SusWrite 554
196% 893 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 91.5
4K Mixed 55.9
185% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 676
532% 742 MB/s
Poor: 148%
This bench: 194%
Great: 293%
BT58SSD13S 1TB
11GB free
Firmware: T0818A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 450
Write 370
Mixed 345
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 95.2
4K Mixed 26
126% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 45.5
83% 158 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 98%
WD PP III Studio II 500GB
63GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 6.8 6.7 6.1 6.3 6.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Read 7.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.2
SusWrite 6.5
9% 6.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-16GIS 04CD F4-2133C15-16GVR 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.6% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.3
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,375 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 GAMING SLI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $597
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback