HP TouchSmart tm2 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP TouchSmart tm2 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1486
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 16:00
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 U 380
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 51.9
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 55
30% 45.6 Pts
4-Core 64.8
8-Core 76.9
9% 70.9 Pts
64-Core 78.5
5% 78.5 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
HP(103C 1486) 1.2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.7
1% 0.65 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SPCCSolidStateDisk 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFQE1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 124 144 121 130 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41% Average
Read 199
Write 171
Mixed 163
SusWrite 134
38% 167 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 30.3
4K Mixed 17
61% 20.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 147
108% 140 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ10UE8BDS0-DJ-F Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 3GB
800, 800 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.1
12% 4.13 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TouchSmart tm2 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP TouchSmart tm2 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback