System Product Name

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardSystem Product Name  (all builds)
Memory44.3 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 14:18
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 81.2
28% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 483
41% 353 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 4600
Nvidia(10DE 0408) 768MB
Ram: 768MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.3% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 2
4% 4.57 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 1.7
2% 3.13 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.3%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3512GNTD 512GB
448GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM60.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 970 581 288 874 671 276 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 622
Write 306
Mixed 454
SusWrite 610
112% 498 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 31.4
97% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 402
260% 301 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 104%
Great: 239%
Netapp X422_HCOBD600A10 600GB
547GB free
Firmware: NA05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 161 161 161 161 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 162
Write 159
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 161
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 92%
Intenso Micro Line 16GB
0GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.9
Write 19.5
Mixed 17.8
24% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Product Name Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO

Motherboard: System Product Name

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback