Hp-pavilion GS387AA-ABZ m9080.it

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHp-pavilion GS387AA-ABZ m9080.it  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Berkeley
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071024
Uptime115.5 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '21 at 09:32
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MKD-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 26.9
2-Core 55.8
35% 50.4 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
MSI(1462 2220) 1.2GB
CLim: 607 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 31.4
Parallax 21.3
15% 23.6 fps
MRender 31
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 19.3
18% 22.1 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.CHL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 67 68 70 68 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 66.9
Write 68.9
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 66.8
42% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 43%
takeMS colorline 4GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.4 3.1 3.6 3.1 3.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
6.71% Terrible
Read 30.4
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 3.2
8% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
25% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback