HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 40% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84FD
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 23:56
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	46%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 84.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 243 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 450 8-Core 477 61% 463 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% HP(103C 8553) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	60.3% Good	Lighting 78.1 Reflection 72.6 Parallax 69.2 64% 73.3 fps	MRender 59.3 Gravity 72.9 Splatting 65 54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB 30,266 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: 80002C00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 82 79 79 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 853 Write 110 Mixed 216 SusWrite 81.7 68% 315 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 30.3 120% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 496 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 174 160% 258 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 164%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 138GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 49 46 60 58 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	43.5% Average	Read 102 Write 71.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 50.3 45% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 39% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB 8,406 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 13.4 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	2,374x
Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	2,006x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	707x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	1,324x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	829x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	709x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	1,395x
hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBSKBench 123%, 30,266 samples	1,225x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GBWDCBench 152%, 17,295 samples	292x

RAM
HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 46%, 8,406 samples	1,894x
HP26D4U6D8ME-16X 1x16GBKingstonBench 47%, 4,169 samples	777x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	451x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $343

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16