Performance Results


Gaming 138% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 132% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201209
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '21 at 19:22
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Memory 80 1-Core 121 2-Core 240 81% 147 Pts	4-Core 463 8-Core 736 74% 600 Pts	64-Core 1168 72% 1168 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$899 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Gigabyte(1458 404B) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.72 Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	167% Outstanding	Lighting 235 Reflection 214 Parallax 237 191% 229 fps	MRender 265 Gravity 212 Splatting 157 167% 211 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 167% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 17 21 26 21 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 291 Write 96.3 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 51.8 28% 131 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 18.9 4K Mixed 10.3 43% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 14.7 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 14.7 11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 100%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 115GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 262 83 80 84 83 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	88.3% Excellent	Read 476 Write 244 Mixed 395 SusWrite 160 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 40.7 138% 50.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 370 278% 370 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 88.3% Great: 121%
Hitachi HUA723030ALA640 3TB-$37 11,382 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: MKAOA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 133 134 132 134 134 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 76.3 Write 77.5 Mixed 48.9 SusWrite 133 61% 84 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	MC Read 36.8 MC Write 30.9 MC Mixed 33.7 97% 33.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 29.1 SC Mixed 26.3 74% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 107%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	175x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	172x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	246x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	185x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $661

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16