TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell G3 3590

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell G3 3590  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0201H1
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 03:48
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 89.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 252
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 554
64% 499 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 84.7%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Dell(1028 0949) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 39.3
Parallax 7.6
5% 17.8 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.5
8% 9 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.99%
 Great: 6%
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Dell(1028 0949) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Lighting 35.6
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 38.4
29% 37.7 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 26.3
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 19% ↑
This bench: 27.7%
 Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1330 1178 820 820 826 817 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,252
Write 1,358
Mixed 998
SusWrite 965
257% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 70.6
228% 76.1 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 794
545% 687 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑
This bench: 209%
 Great: 355%
SDXC Card 64GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
7.41% Terrible
Read 16.4
Write 14.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 14.2
20% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑
This bench: 7.41%
 Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 33.9
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 31.3
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 27.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 93%
 Great: 92%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical G3 3590 Builds (Compare 2,924 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Dell G3 3590

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples1,512x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,411x
Core i7-9850HIntelBench 77%, 9,974 samples1x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples1,468x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 57%, 12,899 samples855x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples442x
SSD
SN520 NVMe WDC 512GBPCBench 145%, 5,261 samples416x
NVMe TOSHIBA 512GBKbg40zns512gBench 133%, 3,818 samples154x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBBc511Bench 147%, 11,857 samples125x
RAM
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 2x4GBUnknownBench 62%, 3,853 samples249x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 13,906 samples181x
KKN2NM-MIE 2x4GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,182 samples173x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback