Acer Predator G9-793

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator G9-793  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Challenger2_SKS
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160919
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '21 at 03:19
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 179
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 430
46% 369 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Acer(1025 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 116
Parallax 91.5
71% 98.1 fps
MRender 93.6
Gravity 92
Splatting 99.5
78% 95 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 34 35 37 37 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 102 103 103 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 114
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 103
70% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1
219% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6MFR8N-TF 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G9-793 Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Acer Predator G9-793

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback