HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8437
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 19:51
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 274
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 537
8-Core 854
85% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,024
63% 1,024 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 135
Parallax 126
99% 127 fps
MRender 95.2
Gravity 129
Splatting 116
93% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U-128G-1006 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT03H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 159 155 157 130 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 470
Write 455
Mixed 388
SusWrite 146
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 88
4K Mixed 51
166% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 344
262% 354 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
503GB free
Firmware: HPH4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 183 181 188 184 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 153
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 182
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 5642160 8904 5642162 8904 5642162 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 24.5
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 25.6
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx Builds (Compare 367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: HP Pavilion Power Desktop 580-1xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback