PC STRIX B250H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC STRIX B250H GAMING  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK STRIX B250H GAMING
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 17:01
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 82%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 131
2-Core 250
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 775
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.3% Above average
Lighting 71.2
Reflection 73.7
Parallax 67
58% 70.6 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 67.3
56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$93
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 249 247 250 250 299 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 453
Write 333
Mixed 323
SusWrite 269
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 44.2
174% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 236
201% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
786GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 166 162 165 164 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 166
Mixed 50
SusWrite 165
99% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 107%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 109 109 109 109 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 106
Write 81.4
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 108
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2TB free, PID 3322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 170 169 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
62% Good
Read 131
Write 135
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 168
168% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 62%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CM4X8GF2133C13K4 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CM4X8GF2133C13K4 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
74.5% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 23.1
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX B250H GAMING Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: PC STRIX B250H GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $459
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback