HP Z220 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z220 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1791
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '21 at 15:51
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 102
2-Core 186
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 500
52% 420 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2181) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2501.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 1117) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 1.7
3% 3.33 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 62 47 57 51 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 393
Write 348
Mixed 341
SusWrite 77.3
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 14.8
63% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 29
77% 159 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA331 2TB
609GB free
Firmware: JKAOA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 88 88 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 99
Write 92
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 87.6
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 68%
ST975042 0AS 750GB
256GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 24.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 27.8
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U7CFR8C-PB 830B NT4GC72B8PG0NF-DI HMT325U7CFR8C-PB 830B NT4GC72B8PG0NF-DI 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z220 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z220 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback