MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star MS-7C89
Motherboard	MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201208
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '21 at 15:11
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Memory 92.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 266 91% 164 Pts	4-Core 499 8-Core 702 76% 600 Pts	64-Core 704 44% 704 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.1 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	46.8% Average	Lighting 59.1 Reflection 60.1 Parallax 78.4 48% 65.9 fps	MRender 60.5 Gravity 60.4 Splatting 44.5 44% 55.1 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG8704RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 145 172 198 200 179 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 426 Write 337 Mixed 1 SusWrite 190 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 12.5 21% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 305GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 111 111 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 108 Write 102 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 111 70% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB 14,281 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 13.7 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 16.8 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 62.4 64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

CPU
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1,174x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	779x
Core i5-10400Intel $99Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	332x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	310x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	236x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	75x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	73x

RAM
CM4X8GD3000C16K4D 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 12,037 samples	91x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	78x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	65x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $281

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16