ECS H61H2-MV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H61H2-MV  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131127
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '21 at 15:01
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2010-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
46.9% Average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 136
55% 93 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 148
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.9
2% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.9
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 192 68 55 58 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.3% Above average
Read 251
Write 182
Mixed 207
SusWrite 107
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 23.3
92% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 146
123% 179 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 12GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 10.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-MV Builds (Compare 937 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-MV - $189

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $276
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback