Motile M141

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMotile M141  (all builds)
MotherboardMOTILE PF4PU1F
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '21 at 18:31
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 17.6
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 147
38% 78.3 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 252
32% 243 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Device(1D05 1077) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.26
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin SS D 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 36 34 34 33 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 324
Write 208
Mixed 266
SusWrite 41.4
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 10.6
41% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 30.5
DQ Mixed 36.9
42% 75 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 62%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
58GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 17 19 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Read 33.5
Write 18.9
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 13.6
25% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 339
12% 339 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M141 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Motile M141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback