Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG ULTRA 17 XUL17M20

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive306% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemSchenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG ULTRA 17 XUL17M20  (all builds)
MotherboardSchenkerTechnologiesGmbH X170SM
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10850K-$249
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 92.4
1-Core 154
2-Core 309
101% 185 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,218
108% 918 Pts
64-Core 1,961
121% 1,961 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7714) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3540 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.74
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 186
Parallax 187
146% 184 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 164
Splatting 138
131% 164 fps
Poor: 98%
This bench: 133%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2308 785 785 786 788 788 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
306% Outstanding
Read 2,588
Write 2,410
Mixed 1,782
SusWrite 1040
437% 1,955 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 88.9
295% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,178
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1049
787% 1,054 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 306%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
363GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2318 826 831 831 831 829 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,599
Write 2426
Mixed 1788
SusWrite 1,078
442% 1,973 MB/s
4K Read 68.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 88.7
293% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,314
DQ Write 1,110
DQ Mixed 1,172
889% 1,199 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 315%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
134GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,624
Write 2370
Mixed 1,826
506% 2,273 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 92.3
307% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,315
DQ Write 1,101
DQ Mixed 1,173
888% 1,196 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-75A7B0 640GB
406GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 98 98 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
Read 95.7
Write 97.5
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 97.7
120% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 24.4
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XMG ULTRA 17 XUL17M20 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO

System: Schenkertechnologiesgmbh XMG ULTRA 17 XUL17M20

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $318
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback