Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS M720  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3128-A1
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130920
Uptime14 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 22:02
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 80
2-Core 196
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 487
53% 420 Pts
64-Core 485
30% 485 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 21.1
11% 17.9 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.5
15% 18.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 12 6.7 2.2 3.8 2.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 248
Write 228
Mixed 201
SusWrite 37.7
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 13.3
56% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 41
DQ Mixed 28.3
33% 58.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 61%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
47GB free
Firmware: SD35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 63 62 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 58.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 62.2
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U7CFR8A 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 33.5
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 12.5
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS M720 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M720

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback