Asrock H61M-VG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VG4  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '21 at 13:18
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 175
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 318
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
MSI(1462 2802) 1GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.28% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 12.8
8% 11 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.28%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GS 240GB-$261
97GB free
Firmware: 5.24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 200 190 203 190 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.2% Above average
Read 242
Write 225
Mixed 211
SusWrite 191
49% 217 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 28
95% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 181
138% 184 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 93%
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0A- 240GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 73 67 15 99 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 212
Mixed 190
SusWrite 80.2
134% 180 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 8.2
1,606% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 160%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
2TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 114 122 122 124 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 139
Write 121
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 118
146% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$9
7GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 15 10 11 11 10 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 115
Write 39.4
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 14.8
59% 53.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.6
224% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 31%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 114 120 119 121 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 44
SusWrite 115
128% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 59%
Compact Flash Card 1GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Read 6
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 0.8
3% 2.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
24% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 8%
xD Picture Card 0GB
0GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.1% Terrible
Read 6.2
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 0.8
3% 2.67 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.1%
Great: 1%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB
2GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
2.86% Terrible
Read 10
Write 2.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.1
5% 4.53 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.86%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VG4 Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback