Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	11.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '21 at 07:01
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	59.7% Above average	Memory 83.8 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 104 52% 80.7 Pts	4-Core 194 8-Core 288 30% 241 Pts	64-Core 286 18% 286 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Lighting 71.8 Reflection 75.6 Parallax 69.1 58% 72.2 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 71.4 Splatting 69.4 57% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 364GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 112 111 111 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 354 Write 195 Mixed 243 SusWrite 112 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 31.7 115% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 175 138% 193 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 129%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2TB free Firmware: GX0B SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 109 110 111 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 187 Write 186 Mixed 91.5 SusWrite 111 106% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 213% 2 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 133%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$39 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 139 140 140 139 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 150 Write 147 Mixed 109 SusWrite 139 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 192% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 83%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 322GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 111 109 109 110 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.7% Good	Read 109 Write 102 Mixed 73.2 SusWrite 110 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 62.7% Great: 72%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 973GB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 102 102 102 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 102 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 99%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 205GB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 39.7 Write 36.4 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 4.7 35% 27.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 21%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID 2352 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 37 38 37 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 38.9 Write 38.7 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 36.9 49% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 32GB 5,781 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.9% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 6.7 MC Mixed 12 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 9.2 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $135Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $685

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16