Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics125% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201021
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '21 at 18:18
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 76.4
1-Core 159
2-Core 318
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,127
105% 873 Pts
64-Core 2,220
137% 2,220 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 96%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4850 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
125% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 225
Parallax 48.8
101% 132 fps
MRender 319
Gravity 233
Splatting 175
190% 242 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 125%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 172 158 160 151 147 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 494
Write 405
Mixed 270
SusWrite 164
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 35.4
122% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 113
108% 169 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 116%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
672GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 433 431 433 413 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 429
Mixed 389
SusWrite 422
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 42.2
137% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 183
142% 195 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
58GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 433 433 433 389 393 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 428
Mixed 396
SusWrite 418
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 42.4
136% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 183
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C14 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 27.3
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 26.4
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback