Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	41.6% Average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 91.1 42% 68 Pts	4-Core 123 8-Core 128 17% 126 Pts	64-Core 130 8% 130 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M 1,680 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 036D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.21% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.4 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.21% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HUAWEI MMC Storage 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 3GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 0.6 1 1.5 1.8 1.7 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.09% Terrible	Read 5 Write 0.3 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 1.3 3% 2.35 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.6 44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.09% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AM1U139C4P2-B19S AD73I1C1674EV 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1067, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.5% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10 23% 8.13 GB/s	SC Read 6.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.7 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 24%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 320MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,680 samples	95x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	19x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	5x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 5,297 samples	14x
EBJ21UE8BDS0-AE-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 26%, 802 samples	12x
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	10x