Asrock 760GM-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 760GM-HDV  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '21 at 07:54
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6130 Six-Core
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 79.6
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 122
55% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 283
32% 252 Pts
64-Core 292
18% 292 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84C8) 1GB
CLim: 1393 MHz, MLim: 1277 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.8
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 17.5
15% 18 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 16.1
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400 2.5" 320GB-$35
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 46 47 55 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 51
Write 38
Mixed 32
SusWrite 47.3
31% 42.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 50%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36
59GB free
Firmware: 0303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 47 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 47.5
Write 50
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 47.1
32% 43.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 200 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.1% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.53 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760GM-HDV Builds (Compare 310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 760GM-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback