Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 22:33
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 50%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 102
45% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 181
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 49.4
46% 53.9 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 47.2
38% 46.5 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 241 270 240 282 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 364
Write 345
Mixed 343
SusWrite 259
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 33.1
108% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 203
157% 215 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
124GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 258 315 327 295 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 348
Write 342
Mixed 350
SusWrite 289
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 58.5
4K Mixed 38.4
124% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 245
185% 247 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 128%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
276GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 75 76 76 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 70.7
Write 72.6
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 74.4
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
480GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 135 134 138 138 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 168
Write 151
Mixed 102
SusWrite 135
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.4% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback