PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock FM2A68M-HD+ (all builds) |
Memory | 5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190213 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 17 '21 at 22:33 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | SVN-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 86B6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
43.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 241 270 240 282 285 MB/s
|
74%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
124GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 258 315 327 295 287 MB/s
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
276GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 73 75 76 76 75 MB/s
|
41.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
480GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 135 134 138 138 138 MB/s
|
87.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 38x |
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples | 27x |
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 32x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 19x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 16x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 12% - Very poor | Total price: $28 |