Asus K84L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus K84L  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K84L
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 20:13
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron B800
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 38.9
2-Core 68.8
43% 62.6 Pts
4-Core 70.3
8-Core 66.7
9% 68.5 Pts
64-Core 70
4% 70 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 13D7) 784MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2559
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.72% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1.1
Parallax 1
1% 0.97 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.7
Splatting 1.1
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.72%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDC2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 74 89 60 99 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 108
Write 91.5
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 75.1
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
78% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Asint SSZ302G08-GDJEC 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 7.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K84L Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K84L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback