Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 174%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive309% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201106
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '21 at 20:08
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 125
2-Core 251
81% 150 Pts
4-Core 557
8-Core 1,071
97% 814 Pts
64-Core 2,194
136% 2,194 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
Asus(1043 87AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
167% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 319
Parallax 253
179% 264 fps
MRender 318
Gravity 242
Splatting 174
192% 244 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 167%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$103
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1646 1579 1498 1375 1373 1365 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
309% Outstanding
Read 2,065
Write 1,592
Mixed 1,458
SusWrite 1,472
369% 1,647 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 87.9
300% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,137
DQ Write 803
DQ Mixed 322
416% 754 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 309%
Great: 410%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
128GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,671
Write 6,482
Mixed 6,108
1,434% 6,420 MB/s
4K Read 720
4K Write 398
4K Mixed 395
1,807% 504 MB/s
DQ Read 1,438
DQ Write 885
DQ Mixed 1,082
827% 1,135 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 236 231 245 219 254 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 45.7
Write 131
Mixed 47
SusWrite 234
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.5
207% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 213%
Seagate BUP Portable 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 127 129 126 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 51.7
Write 122
Mixed 81
SusWrite 127
71% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
178% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 43.2
MC Write 62.7
MC Mixed 42
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 94.7
42% 94.7 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 121%
Great: 181%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $794
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback