Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3667U 3,556 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 87 2-Core 144 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 196 8-Core 206 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Apple(106B 00FE) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.34% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 2 Parallax 2.8 3% 2.97 fps	MRender 4.6 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.9 3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.34% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SM256E 251GB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM09A1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 385 Write 301 Mixed 227 67% 304 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 21.4 4K Mixed 14.3 48% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 88.7 DQ Mixed 136 110% 159 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 97%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 250GB 1,518 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 82GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 33 Write 21.5 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 18 28% 21.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.6 93% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 17 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-3427UIntelBench 49%, 4,182 samples	26x
Core i7-3667UIntelBench 51%, 3,556 samples	6x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	32x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	26x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16