MSI X99A MPOWER (MS-7885)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7885
MotherboardMSI X99A MPOWER (MS-7885)  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '21 at 23:03
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 202
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 601
60% 489 Pts
64-Core 801
50% 801 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 47.5
Parallax 56.9
37% 50.1 fps
MRender 46.5
Gravity 43.8
Splatting 33.2
33% 41.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,601
Write 702
Mixed 533
206% 945 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 41.7
149% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 537
DQ Write 247
DQ Mixed 362
277% 382 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 243%
WD WD1004FBYZ-01YCBB1 1TB
755GB free
Firmware: RR02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 174 174 174 175 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 194
Mixed 118
SusWrite 176
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
368% 3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 34.5
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 20.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99A MPOWER (MS-7885) Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X99A MPOWER (MS-7885)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $589
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback