Biostar H410MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H410MH  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '21 at 18:19
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100-$64
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 263
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 521
8-Core 726
79% 623 Pts
64-Core 713
44% 713 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 176
Parallax 165
150% 175 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 139
Splatting 118
114% 142 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gamer L TA1D0120A 120GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 50 150 113 76 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
78.5% Very good
Read 468
Write 164
Mixed 327
SusWrite 76
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 36.9
156% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 4.9
50% 122 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
388GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 142 146 157 157 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 156
Mixed 72
SusWrite 148
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 53L4P-2HBMJR-MR8LF HX426C16FB2/8 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.3
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 23.3
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 1,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback