Asus M11AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus M11AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M11AD
Memory5.3 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '21 at 16:10
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460S
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 343
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
XFX(1682 9550) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 22.5
13% 22.2 fps
MRender 25.4
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 25.1
18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk U110 128GB-$69
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U220
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 23 13 24 14 9.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 372
Write 37.1
Mixed 45.6
SusWrite 18.5
25% 118 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 4.8
13% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 51%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
470GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 140 138 146 146 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 150
Write 133
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 140
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MI64C1D1629Z1 1311 NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 10GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M11AD Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M11AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback