MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180717
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 23:17
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 109
2-Core 204
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 463
56% 427 Pts
64-Core 573
35% 573 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 189 13 70 36 41 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 452
Write 390
Mixed 398
SusWrite 92
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 26.3
131% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 1.2
78% 184 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
184GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 104 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 146
Write 133
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 103
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
219% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 109%
WD WD1001FAES-60Z2A0 1TB
543GB free
Firmware: 06.01D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 108 110 109 108 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 134
Write 120
Mixed 71.7
SusWrite 106
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 12GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 2,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817) - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback