Asus P9D WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P9D WS  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 13:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 87.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 219
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 620
65% 519 Pts
64-Core 653
40% 653 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.2.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 78
42% 63.4 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 59
Splatting 45.1
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 215 203 188 181 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 413
Mixed 321
SusWrite 198
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 48.1
175% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 342
260% 352 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
351GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 124 124 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 137
Write 122
Mixed 106
SusWrite 125
91% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.3% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 16.4
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9D WS Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P9D WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback