HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory9.8 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20091216
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 12:37
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 660
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 68
1-Core 79.4
2-Core 138
56% 95 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 195
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Asus(1043 0461) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.251.9001.1001
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 2.1
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 241 245 243 248 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
72.7% Very good
Read 248
Write 247
Mixed 236
SusWrite 244
55% 244 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 36.7
125% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 185
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
203GB free
Firmware: JP1OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 120 120 122 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 120
Write 118
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 120
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 ID:85 9B CT51264BA160B.C16 52GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 12
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.5 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback