Fujitsu LifeBook T5010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu LifeBook T5010  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB1EA
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '21 at 05:16
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T9600-$170
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 72.7
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 76.7
42% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 78.8
8-Core 62.1
10% 70.4 Pts
64-Core 74.5
5% 74.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 44%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNS064GG2BBAA 64GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGF1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 203
Write 170
Mixed 155
132% 176 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 16.9
3,158% 21.6 MB/s
DQ Read 13.7
DQ Write 40.5
DQ Mixed 19.4
201% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 66%
O2micro SD 16GB
3GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.9 4.6 5.1 5.2 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Read 4
Write 5.8
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 5.2
4% 4.88 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.7
486% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 24%
Mass Storage Device 8GB
7GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 15 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
8.62% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 16.9
Mixed 16
SusWrite 17.3
23% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.62%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 5.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.63 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback